ASIF RAJ vs State of Bihar — 718/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BREC010049132026

Filing Number

4550/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

718/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

1-Principal District and sessions Judge

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 15-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

70

Police Station

RAM GARHWA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASIF RAJ

    Adv. MANI BHUSHAN SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Order By CourtView PDF

    Case 718/2026 Summary: The Sessions Judge rejected Asif Raj's bail petition in a cyber fraud case. The court found sufficient evidence including recovered ATM cards, corroborating witness statements, and complaints against bank accounts used by the accused, despite the petitioner's claims of false implication and lack of evidence. The ongoing investigation status reinforced the court's decision to deny bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  5. 26-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 718/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 718/2026 Summary: The Sessions Judge rejected Asif Raj's bail petition in a cyber fraud case. The court found sufficient evidence including recovered ATM cards, corroborating witness statements, and complaints against bank accounts used by the accused, despite the petitioner's claims of false implication and lack of evidence. The ongoing investigation status reinforced the court's decision to deny bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case