DHARMENDRA KUMAR YADAV vs State of Bihar — 714/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BREC010049092026

Filing Number

4546/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

714/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

1-Principal District and sessions Judge

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 15-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

76

Police Station

RAJEPUR

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DHARMENDRA KUMAR YADAV

    Adv. AMRENDRA KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Order By CourtView PDF

    The Sessions Judge granted bail to Dharmendra Kumar Yadav, who was in judicial custody since February 2026 in connection with a communal violence case involving looting during a Hindu-Muslim dispute. Although the petitioner had thirteen criminal antecedents and was mentioned in the case diary as involved in the looting, the court found that he was not named in the FIR and that co-accused persons had already been granted bail, warranting his release on bail of Rs. 10,000 with conditions including regular court appearance and fortnightly police reporting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  5. 04-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  6. 26-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 714/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge granted bail to Dharmendra Kumar Yadav, who was in judicial custody since February 2026 in connection with a communal violence case involving looting during a Hindu-Muslim dispute. Although the petitioner had thirteen criminal antecedents and was mentioned in the case diary as involved in the looting, the court found that he was not named in the FIR and that co-accused persons had already been granted bail, warranting his release on bail of Rs. 10,000 with conditions including regular court appearance and fortnightly police reporting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case