GULSHAN KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 708/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BREC010048412026

Filing Number

4484/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

708/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

1-Principal District and sessions Judge

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 22-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

24

Police Station

KOTWA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GULSHAN KUMAR

    Adv. NARENDRA DEO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Order By CourtView PDF

    Case Summary: Gulshan Kumar vs. State of Bihar (Bail Petition 708/2026) The Sessions Judge rejected Gulshan Kumar's bail petition. The petitioner was charged under BNS sections 107, 238, 339, and 3(5) in connection with the suicide of his girlfriend Rekha Kumari after he refused to marry her. The court found witness statements and postmortem evidence (asphyxia by hanging) supported the prosecution case that the deceased was visibly distressed following the petitioner's marriage refusal. Despite petitioner's argument lacking direct evidence of instigation, the court considered the nature and gravity of the abetment allegations sufficient to deny bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 708/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Gulshan Kumar vs. State of Bihar (Bail Petition 708/2026) The Sessions Judge rejected Gulshan Kumar's bail petition. The petitioner was charged under BNS sections 107, 238, 339, and 3(5) in connection with the suicide of his girlfriend Rekha Kumari after he refused to marry her. The court found witness statements and postmortem evidence (asphyxia by hanging) supported the prosecution case that the deceased was visibly distressed following the petitioner's marriage refusal. Despite petitioner's argument lacking direct evidence of instigation, the court considered the nature and gravity of the abetment allegations sufficient to deny bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case