ASHISH SINGH vs State of Bihar — 702/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 25th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BREC010048352026
Filing Number
4478/2026
Filing Date
13-Mar-2026
Registration No
702/2026
Registration Date
13-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Motihari
Judge
1-Principal District and sessions Judge
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
87
Police Station
CHAITAUNI
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ASHISH SINGH
Adv. AKHILESH SHARAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Order By CourtView PDF
Summary of Case 702/2026 (Ashish Singh vs. State of Bihar) The Sessions Judge rejected Ashish Singh's bail petition filed on 25.03.2026. Singh was accused of assaulting the informant's son with a sharp kudaal causing head injury during a land dispute over unauthorized road encroachment. The court found the FIR allegations credible, supported by the informant's restatement, witness corroboration, and medical injury reports documenting the incised wounds. Despite Singh's clean criminal record and claims of false implication, the judge deemed the nature and gravity of allegations and available evidence insufficient to grant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 702/2026
Summary of Case 702/2026 (Ashish Singh vs. State of Bihar) The Sessions Judge rejected Ashish Singh's bail petition filed on 25.03.2026. Singh was accused of assaulting the informant's son with a sharp kudaal causing head injury during a land dispute over unauthorized road encroachment. The court found the FIR allegations credible, supported by the informant's restatement, witness corroboration, and medical injury reports documenting the incised wounds. Despite Singh's clean criminal record and claims of false implication, the judge deemed the nature and gravity of allegations and available evidence insufficient to grant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts