KRISHNA RAI vs State of Bihar — 1408/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 22nd April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BREC010047522026

Filing Number

4401/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

1408/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

1-Principal District and sessions Judge

Decision Date

22-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 15-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

185

Police Station

CHIRAIYA

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KRISHNA RAI

    Adv. YUGESH KUMAR MISHRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    Order By CourtView PDF

    Case Summary: Krishna Rai & 5 Ors. vs. State of Bihar (1408/2026) The court dismissed the anticipatory bail petition as not maintainable, holding that once cognizance has been taken in a case, the accused must surrender before the trial court and apply for regular bail instead of filing an anticipatory bail application. The court directed the petitioners to surrender and seek regular bail, which the trial court shall consider favorably given their prior compliance and lack of criminal history. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  6. 04-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  7. 26-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1408/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Krishna Rai & 5 Ors. vs. State of Bihar (1408/2026) The court dismissed the anticipatory bail petition as not maintainable, holding that once cognizance has been taken in a case, the accused must surrender before the trial court and apply for regular bail instead of filing an anticipatory bail application. The court directed the petitioners to surrender and seek regular bail, which the trial court shall consider favorably given their prior compliance and lack of criminal history. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case