MANU KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 1406/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 22nd April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BREC010047032026

Filing Number

4368/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

1406/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

4-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 6th

Decision Date

22-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

97

Police Station

SANGRAMPUR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANU KUMAR

    Adv. PRABHU SAHANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    Order By Court

    SUMMARY: The court rejected Manu Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a POCSO Act case involving the alleged kidnapping of a minor girl on March 3, 2025. The court found direct and specific allegations against the petitioner, noting that the victim (born January 1, 2010) stated she went with him voluntarily to Patna, but her consent is legally void as a minor; the court deemed him the main accused with investigation ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 6th

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 6th

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 6th

  6. 26-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 6th

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1406/2026

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The court rejected Manu Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a POCSO Act case involving the alleged kidnapping of a minor girl on March 3, 2025. The court found direct and specific allegations against the petitioner, noting that the victim (born January 1, 2010) stated she went with him voluntarily to Patna, but her consent is legally void as a minor; the court deemed him the main accused with investigation ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case