LALDHARI SAH AND ORS vs State of Bihar — 1395/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BREC010046872026

Filing Number

4355/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

1395/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

7-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 2nd

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

17

Police Station

PACHPAKDI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LALDHARI SAH AND ORS

    Adv. RAM DHANI SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Order By CourtView PDF

    Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge-2, East Champaran rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by six accused persons (Laldhari Sah and others) in a case involving allegations of criminal intimidation, assault, and grievous injury during a land dispute on 28.01.2026. The court found that the petitioners had criminal antecedents, specific assault allegations against them were supported by eyewitness testimony and injury reports showing grievous injuries, and investigation was ongoing, making them ineligible for pre-arrest bail protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 2nd

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 2nd

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1395/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge-2, East Champaran rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by six accused persons (Laldhari Sah and others) in a case involving allegations of criminal intimidation, assault, and grievous injury during a land dispute on 28.01.2026. The court found that the petitioners had criminal antecedents, specific assault allegations against them were supported by eyewitness testimony and injury reports showing grievous injuries, and investigation was ongoing, making them ineligible for pre-arrest bail protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case