RAJU RAI vs State of Bihar — 1394/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BREC010046862026

Filing Number

4354/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

1394/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

1-Principal District and sessions Judge

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

455

Police Station

RAXAUL

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJU RAI

    Adv. Dharmendra Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Order By Court

    The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Raju Rai, finding him specifically named in the FIR for assaulting the informant's brothers with weapons and snatching a gold chain, with injuries corroborated by medical reports and witness statements. Despite the petitioner's clean criminal record and the defense argument that the case was compromised, the court deemed the serious nature of the allegations and available evidence insufficient to grant pre-arrest bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1394/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Raju Rai, finding him specifically named in the FIR for assaulting the informant's brothers with weapons and snatching a gold chain, with injuries corroborated by medical reports and witness statements. Despite the petitioner's clean criminal record and the defense argument that the case was compromised, the court deemed the serious nature of the allegations and available evidence insufficient to grant pre-arrest bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case