VISHAL KUMAR AND ORS vs State of Bihar — 1392/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED ON WITHDRAWAL on 25th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BREC010046832026

Filing Number

4351/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

1392/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

16-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 10th

Decision Date

25-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED ON WITHDRAWAL

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

49

Police Station

DUMARIA GHAT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VISHAL KUMAR AND ORS

    Adv. NAVIN KUMAR SRIVASTAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Apr-2026

    Order By CourtView PDF

    Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by three petitioners (Vishal Kumar, Vicky Singh, and Ranjan Kumar) as withdrawn. The petitioners' counsel submitted that the petitioners had received the benefit of Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, and the public prosecutor conceded to the withdrawal request, which the court allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 10th

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 10th

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 10th

  6. 26-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 10th

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 10th

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1392/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by three petitioners (Vishal Kumar, Vicky Singh, and Ranjan Kumar) as withdrawn. The petitioners' counsel submitted that the petitioners had received the benefit of Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, and the public prosecutor conceded to the withdrawal request, which the court allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case