UMESH RAY AND ORS vs State of Bihar — 1388/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 06th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BREC010046792026
Filing Number
4347/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
1388/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Motihari
Judge
26-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 19th
Decision Date
06-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
68
Police Station
PIPRA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UMESH RAY AND ORS
Adv. PRIYANSHU KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Apr-2026
Order By Court
Summary: The court rejected anticipatory bail for petitioners Umesh Ray, Sunesh Rai, and Binda Ray, finding the allegations of assault resulting in serious injuries (including a 7cm stitched head wound) to be serious in nature. However, the court granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Sundarmukhi Devi, as no allegations were leveled against her, with bail fixed at Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 19th
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 19th
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 19th
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 1388/2026
Summary: The court rejected anticipatory bail for petitioners Umesh Ray, Sunesh Rai, and Binda Ray, finding the allegations of assault resulting in serious injuries (including a 7cm stitched head wound) to be serious in nature. However, the court granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Sundarmukhi Devi, as no allegations were leveled against her, with bail fixed at Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts