SARITA DEVI vs State of Bihar — 1383/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 23rd April 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BREC010046742026

Case disposed

Filing Number

4342/2026

Filing Date

11-03-2026

Registration No

1383/2026

Registration Date

11-03-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 5th

Decision Date

23rd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

FIR Details

FIR Number

281

Police Station

ADAPUR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

SARITA DEVI

Adv. KUMAR PANKAJ

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 5th

23-04-2026

Disposed

21-04-2026

HEARING

17-04-2026

HEARING

10-04-2026

HEARING

06-04-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

23-04-2026
Order By Court

Court Decision Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge in Motihari rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Sarita Devi, accused in a dowry death case. The court found the allegations serious—involving torture and harassment of the deceased for dowry demands leading to her death by hanging within seven years of marriage—and deemed custodial interrogation necessary for evidence collection. Given the heinous nature of the offenses, the early investigation stage, and public faith considerations, the court determined no compelling circumstances existed to grant pre-arrest bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge in Motihari rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Sarita Devi, accused in a dowry death case. The court found the allegations serious—involving torture and harassment of the deceased for dowry demands leading to her death by hanging within seven years of marriage—and deemed custodial interrogation necessary for evidence collection. Given the heinous nature of the offenses, the early investigation stage, and public faith considerations, the court determined no compelling circumstances existed to grant pre-arrest bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Motihari All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case