AKHATAR KHAN AND ORS vs State of Bihar — 1382/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BREC010046732026

Filing Number

4341/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

1382/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

26-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 19th

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

13

Police Station

PALANWAN

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AKHATAR KHAN AND ORS

    Adv. RUPESH KUMAR THAKUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Order By Court

    The court granted anticipatory bail to four petitioners (Akhtar Khan, Nabi Hassan Khan, Lal Khan, and Javed Khan) but rejected it for five others (Noor Hasan Khan, Zobair Khan, Majid Khan, Aurangzeb Khan, and Raja Khan) in an assault and theft case. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence against the latter group based on injury reports and case diary materials, while the former had no direct allegations against them and clean criminal records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 19th

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 19th

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1382/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to four petitioners (Akhtar Khan, Nabi Hassan Khan, Lal Khan, and Javed Khan) but rejected it for five others (Noor Hasan Khan, Zobair Khan, Majid Khan, Aurangzeb Khan, and Raja Khan) in an assault and theft case. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence against the latter group based on injury reports and case diary materials, while the former had no direct allegations against them and clean criminal records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case