SHAMSHAD vs State of Bihar — 1378/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED ON WITHDRAWAL on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BREC010046692026

Filing Number

4337/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

1378/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

27-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 20th

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED ON WITHDRAWAL

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

302

Police Station

DHAKA

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHAMSHAD

    Adv. BALIRAJ KUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Order By CourtView PDF

    The court granted bail to the accused Rameshwar Sahni in a case involving charges under IPC sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(3), 352, 351(2), 118(2), and 3(5), after he had been in judicial custody since January 15, 2026. The court found that the injuries were of a simple nature, the accused had no prior criminal history, and bail was justified, conditioning his release on a bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of equal amount and undertaking that he would not commit similar offenses in the future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 20th

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 20th

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 20th

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1378/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to the accused Rameshwar Sahni in a case involving charges under IPC sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(3), 352, 351(2), 118(2), and 3(5), after he had been in judicial custody since January 15, 2026. The court found that the injuries were of a simple nature, the accused had no prior criminal history, and bail was justified, conditioning his release on a bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of equal amount and undertaking that he would not commit similar offenses in the future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case