KRISHNANDAN MAHTO vs State of Bihar — 1377/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BREC010046682026

Filing Number

4336/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

1377/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

26-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 19th

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

15

Police Station

PACHPAKDI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KRISHNANDAN MAHTO

    Adv. RAKESH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Order By Court

    The court granted anticipatory bail to all seven petitioners (Krishnandan Mahto and others) in a case involving allegations of assault and outraging modesty. The court found that the injuries were simple in nature, prior criminal antecedents of two petitioners were not a bar to bail, and the petition was influenced by rival litigation between the parties. Each petitioner was directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 19th

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 19th

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 19th

  6. 02-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 19th

  7. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 19th

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 19th

  9. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1377/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to all seven petitioners (Krishnandan Mahto and others) in a case involving allegations of assault and outraging modesty. The court found that the injuries were simple in nature, prior criminal antecedents of two petitioners were not a bar to bail, and the petition was influenced by rival litigation between the parties. Each petitioner was directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case