VISHAL KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 1374/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BREC010046532026

Filing Number

4321/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

1374/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

1-Principal District and sessions Judge

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

57

Police Station

KALAYANPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VISHAL KUMAR

    Adv. CHANDRA SHEKHAR AZAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Order By CourtView PDF

    The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Vishal Kumar and Bharat Sah, who were accused of murdering a young man over a stolen silver ring that was sold to them. The court found the gravity of the allegations serious—involving alleged kidnapping, murder, and disposing of the body in a canal—and determined that despite the petitioners' clean criminal records and defense claims of innocence, pre-arrest bail was not warranted given the nature and seriousness of the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1374/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Vishal Kumar and Bharat Sah, who were accused of murdering a young man over a stolen silver ring that was sold to them. The court found the gravity of the allegations serious—involving alleged kidnapping, murder, and disposing of the body in a canal—and determined that despite the petitioners' clean criminal records and defense claims of innocence, pre-arrest bail was not warranted given the nature and seriousness of the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case