SADDAM ALAM vs State of Bihar — 1371/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 29th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BREC010046402026

Filing Number

4308/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

1371/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

19-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 13th

Decision Date

29-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

94

Police Station

PAHARPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SADDAM ALAM

    Adv. CHANDRALOKI KUMAR MISHRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Order By Court

    The court dismissed the interim bail application (filed on 11.03.2026) as the applicants failed to appear despite repeated calls, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the petition. The court found no merit in continuing the proceedings and ordered the application to be rejected due to non-prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 13th

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 13th

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 13th

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 13th

  7. 19-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 13th

  8. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 13th

  9. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 13th

  10. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1371/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the interim bail application (filed on 11.03.2026) as the applicants failed to appear despite repeated calls, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the petition. The court found no merit in continuing the proceedings and ordered the application to be rejected due to non-prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case