JAGAN MAHTO vs State of Bihar — 1369/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BREC010046382026

Filing Number

4306/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

1369/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

224

Police Station

MADHUBAN

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAGAN MAHTO

    Adv. TRIBHUWAN PRASAD YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Order By CourtView PDF

    The District & Additional Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by three accused (Jagan Mahto, Ranjeet Mahto, and Sunil Rai) in a kidnapping case, holding that a second anticipatory bail petition without significant new evidence is not maintainable under Supreme Court precedent. The court noted that an earlier identical petition had already been rejected on merit, making the present application liable for rejection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1369/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District & Additional Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by three accused (Jagan Mahto, Ranjeet Mahto, and Sunil Rai) in a kidnapping case, holding that a second anticipatory bail petition without significant new evidence is not maintainable under Supreme Court precedent. The court noted that an earlier identical petition had already been rejected on merit, making the present application liable for rejection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case