RUPESH KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 677/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BREC010046342026

Filing Number

4302/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

677/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

1-Principal District and sessions Judge

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

27

Police Station

MALAHI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RUPESH KUMAR

    Adv. ANKIT KASHYAP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Order By CourtView PDF

    The Sessions Judge rejected Rupesh Kumar's bail petition in a murder case (IPC §103(1) and 3(5)) involving the death of the informant's son. The court found sufficient incriminating material, including witness statements, postmortem evidence showing vital organ injuries caused by blunt force trauma, and prosecution corroboration, outweighing the petitioner's lack of criminal antecedents. The judge also directed the police superintendent to take action against the investigating officer for failing to submit the accused's criminal antecedent report in the case diary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 677/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge rejected Rupesh Kumar's bail petition in a murder case (IPC §103(1) and 3(5)) involving the death of the informant's son. The court found sufficient incriminating material, including witness statements, postmortem evidence showing vital organ injuries caused by blunt force trauma, and prosecution corroboration, outweighing the petitioner's lack of criminal antecedents. The judge also directed the police superintendent to take action against the investigating officer for failing to submit the accused's criminal antecedent report in the case diary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case