AMAN KHAN vs State of Bihar — 675/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 18th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BREC010046322026
Filing Number
4300/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
675/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Motihari
Judge
16-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 10th
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
321
Police Station
SUGAULI
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AMAN KHAN
Adv. PRAVEEN KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Order By CourtView PDF
Summary The District and Additional Sessions Court, East Champaran, rejected the bail application of Aman Khan in a Supauli Police Case (FIR No. 321/2024) involving charges under IPC sections 126(2), 115, 118(1), 117(2), 109, 303(2), 3(5) and the Arms Act section 27. The court found that Aman Khan was a primary accused in a serious gang violence incident on July 17, 2024, where multiple people were killed and injured using firearms and weapons in a premeditated manner, and considering his long criminal history and the grave nature of the charges, bail was not warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 10th
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 10th
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 675/2026
Summary The District and Additional Sessions Court, East Champaran, rejected the bail application of Aman Khan in a Supauli Police Case (FIR No. 321/2024) involving charges under IPC sections 126(2), 115, 118(1), 117(2), 109, 303(2), 3(5) and the Arms Act section 27. The court found that Aman Khan was a primary accused in a serious gang violence incident on July 17, 2024, where multiple people were killed and injured using firearms and weapons in a premeditated manner, and considering his long criminal history and the grave nature of the charges, bail was not warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts