AMAN KHAN vs State of Bihar — 675/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 18th March 2026.

Regular Bail

CNR: BREC010046322026

Case disposed

Filing Number

4300/2026

Filing Date

11-03-2026

Registration No

675/2026

Registration Date

11-03-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

16-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 10th

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

FIR Details

FIR Number

321

Police Station

SUGAULI

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

AMAN KHAN

Adv. PRAVEEN KUMAR

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 16-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 10th

18-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

HEARING

12-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
Order By Court

Summary The District and Additional Sessions Court, East Champaran, rejected the bail application of Aman Khan in a Supauli Police Case (FIR No. 321/2024) involving charges under IPC sections 126(2), 115, 118(1), 117(2), 109, 303(2), 3(5) and the Arms Act section 27. The court found that Aman Khan was a primary accused in a serious gang violence incident on July 17, 2024, where multiple people were killed and injured using firearms and weapons in a premeditated manner, and considering his long criminal history and the grave nature of the charges, bail was not warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District and Additional Sessions Court, East Champaran, rejected the bail application of Aman Khan in a Supauli Police Case (FIR No. 321/2024) involving charges under IPC sections 126(2), 115, 118(1), 117(2), 109, 303(2), 3(5) and the Arms Act section 27. The court found that Aman Khan was a primary accused in a serious gang violence incident on July 17, 2024, where multiple people were killed and injured using firearms and weapons in a premeditated manner, and considering his long criminal history and the grave nature of the charges, bail was not warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Motihari All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case