PRABHAT KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 674/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BREC010046232026

Filing Number

4291/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

674/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

18-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

45

Police Station

DUMARIA GHAT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRABHAT KUMAR

    Adv. SHASHI BHUSHAN PRASAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Order By CourtView PDF

    Summary The Court of District & Additional Sessions Judge-VIII, East Champaran granted regular bail to Prabhat Kumar @Tempal, accused in a diesel and vehicle seizure case. The court found the prosecution's evidence weak—witnesses were only police personnel with no independent witnesses, and confessional statements lack legal value. The petitioner was released on ₹10,000 bail bonds with two sureties, subject to conditions including non-repetition of offenses and cooperation in trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 674/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Court of District & Additional Sessions Judge-VIII, East Champaran granted regular bail to Prabhat Kumar @Tempal, accused in a diesel and vehicle seizure case. The court found the prosecution's evidence weak—witnesses were only police personnel with no independent witnesses, and confessional statements lack legal value. The petitioner was released on ₹10,000 bail bonds with two sureties, subject to conditions including non-repetition of offenses and cooperation in trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case