KRISHNA KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 673/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BREC010046222026

Filing Number

4290/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

673/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

18-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

668

Police Station

MOTIHARI MUFFASSIL

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KRISHNA KUMAR

    Adv. ARVIND KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Order By CourtView PDF

    Court Decision Summary: The District and Additional Sessions Judge-VIII of East Champaran rejected Krishna Kumar's bail petition in a case involving armed robbery and dacoity charges under BNS sections 310(2), 311, 317(3), and 3(5). The court found strong prosecution evidence including witness statements and confessional statements from co-accused implicating the petitioner, coupled with his pending criminal case of similar nature involving arms act violations, warranting continued judicial custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 673/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary: The District and Additional Sessions Judge-VIII of East Champaran rejected Krishna Kumar's bail petition in a case involving armed robbery and dacoity charges under BNS sections 310(2), 311, 317(3), and 3(5). The court found strong prosecution evidence including witness statements and confessional statements from co-accused implicating the petitioner, coupled with his pending criminal case of similar nature involving arms act violations, warranting continued judicial custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case