VIKAHS KUMAR PATEL vs State of Bihar — 669/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BREC010046172026

Filing Number

4285/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

669/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

1-Principal District and sessions Judge

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

23

Police Station

HARAIYA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIKAHS KUMAR PATEL

    Adv. RAM DHANI SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Order By CourtView PDF

    Summary: The Sessions Judge rejected the bail petition of Vikash Kumar Patel, who was arrested in connection with large-scale counterfeit currency printing involving Rs. 25,00,000 in Nepali notes and Rs. 18,500 in Indian notes, along with printing materials recovered during a police raid. The court found the allegations serious, the FIR and case diary materials credible with corroborating witness statements, and the ongoing investigation status warranted continued custody rather than bail release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 669/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Sessions Judge rejected the bail petition of Vikash Kumar Patel, who was arrested in connection with large-scale counterfeit currency printing involving Rs. 25,00,000 in Nepali notes and Rs. 18,500 in Indian notes, along with printing materials recovered during a police raid. The court found the allegations serious, the FIR and case diary materials credible with corroborating witness statements, and the ongoing investigation status warranted continued custody rather than bail release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case