DHRUV RAI vs State of Bihar — 666/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BREC010046142026

Filing Number

4282/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

666/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

17-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 11th

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

546

Police Station

TURKOLIA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DHRUV RAI

    Adv. DINESH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Order By Court

    Summary The court granted bail to Dhruv Rai on regular bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of equal amount. The court found that while the accused was charged with assault offenses, the injuries were simple in nature, no independent witnesses were examined, there was a 15-day delay in lodging the FIR, and co-accused persons had already been granted bail, making detention unjustified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 11th

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 11th

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 666/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted bail to Dhruv Rai on regular bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of equal amount. The court found that while the accused was charged with assault offenses, the injuries were simple in nature, no independent witnesses were examined, there was a 15-day delay in lodging the FIR, and co-accused persons had already been granted bail, making detention unjustified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case