MD. AZAMUDDIN vs State of Bihar — 664/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 04th April 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BREC010045092026
Filing Number
4191/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
664/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
DJ Div. Motihari
Judge
1-Principal District and sessions Judge
Decision Date
04th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
338
Police Station
DHAKA
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MD. AZAMUDDIN
Adv. MD TANWEER HAIDAR
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and sessions Judge
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 01-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 23-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 11-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court of East Champaran granted bail to applicant Md. Azamuddin in criminal case FIR No. 338/2018, involving charges under IPC sections 147, 149, 323, 504, 283, 427, 435, 353, 290, and 291. The court found that the applicant was not named in the FIR despite being identified during investigation, had no prior criminal history, and co-accused persons had already been released on bail by the High Court. Bail was approved with conditions including cooperation in investigation, providing a surety, and furnishing a bond of ₹10,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court of East Champaran granted bail to applicant Md. Azamuddin in criminal case FIR No. 338/2018, involving charges under IPC sections 147, 149, 323, 504, 283, 427, 435, 353, 290, and 291. The court found that the applicant was not named in the FIR despite being identified during investigation, had no prior criminal history, and co-accused persons had already been released on bail by the High Court. Bail was approved with conditions including cooperation in investigation, providing a surety, and furnishing a bond of ₹10,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts