MD. AZAMUDDIN vs State of Bihar — 664/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 04th April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BREC010045092026

Filing Number

4191/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

664/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

1-Principal District and sessions Judge

Decision Date

04-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

338

Police Station

DHAKA

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD. AZAMUDDIN

    Adv. MD TANWEER HAIDAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    Order By Court

    Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court of East Champaran granted bail to applicant Md. Azamuddin in criminal case FIR No. 338/2018, involving charges under IPC sections 147, 149, 323, 504, 283, 427, 435, 353, 290, and 291. The court found that the applicant was not named in the FIR despite being identified during investigation, had no prior criminal history, and co-accused persons had already been released on bail by the High Court. Bail was approved with conditions including cooperation in investigation, providing a surety, and furnishing a bond of ₹10,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 664/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court of East Champaran granted bail to applicant Md. Azamuddin in criminal case FIR No. 338/2018, involving charges under IPC sections 147, 149, 323, 504, 283, 427, 435, 353, 290, and 291. The court found that the applicant was not named in the FIR despite being identified during investigation, had no prior criminal history, and co-accused persons had already been released on bail by the High Court. Bail was approved with conditions including cooperation in investigation, providing a surety, and furnishing a bond of ₹10,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case