ARBIND KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 1328/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 06th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BREC010044792026
Filing Number
4161/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
1328/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Motihari
Judge
1-Principal District and sessions Judge
Decision Date
06-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
359
Police Station
LAKHAURA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARBIND KUMAR
Adv. NAGESHWAR PRASAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Apr-2026
Order By CourtView PDF
The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Arbind Kumar and three others, who were accused of assaulting the informant's family in a fatal attack that resulted in the death of the informant's mother, Babita Devi, from intracranial hemorrhage caused by blunt force injuries. The court found that the petitioners were named in the FIR, witnesses supported the prosecution's account, post-mortem evidence confirmed fatal injuries, and other family members suffered documented injuries, making the gravity of the offense unsuitable for pre-arrest bail despite the petitioners' clean criminal record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
01-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 1328/2026
The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Arbind Kumar and three others, who were accused of assaulting the informant's family in a fatal attack that resulted in the death of the informant's mother, Babita Devi, from intracranial hemorrhage caused by blunt force injuries. The court found that the petitioners were named in the FIR, witnesses supported the prosecution's account, post-mortem evidence confirmed fatal injuries, and other family members suffered documented injuries, making the gravity of the offense unsuitable for pre-arrest bail despite the petitioners' clean criminal record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts