AKASH KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 650/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 18th April 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BREC010044302026
Filing Number
4117/2026
Filing Date
07-Mar-2026
Registration No
650/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Motihari
Judge
26-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 19th
Decision Date
18-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 07-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
338
Police Station
DHAKA
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AKASH KUMAR
Adv. ANUJ KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Apr-2026
Order By Court
The District & Additional Sessions Judge at East Champaran allowed Akash Kumar's bail petition in a robbery case. The court found that while the petitioner's name emerged from a co-accused's confession and he had prior criminal antecedents, the chargesheet was already filed, negating investigation interference concerns, and no evidence of tampering was shown. He was granted bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 19th
-
10-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 19th
-
06-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 19th
-
30-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 19th
-
23-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 19th
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 19th
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 19th
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 650/2026
The District & Additional Sessions Judge at East Champaran allowed Akash Kumar's bail petition in a robbery case. The court found that while the petitioner's name emerged from a co-accused's confession and he had prior criminal antecedents, the chargesheet was already filed, negating investigation interference concerns, and no evidence of tampering was shown. He was granted bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts