FAIJAN ANSARI vs State of Bihar — 1319/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BREC010044222026

Filing Number

4109/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

1319/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

1-Principal District and sessions Judge

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

101

Police Station

Motihari Cyber

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.FAIJAN ANSARI

    Adv. ANKIT KASHYAP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Order By Court

    The Court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Faijan Ansari, who was accused of operating an overseas employment fraud scheme that defrauded victims of Rs. 21,75,000 through forged documents and false promises. The Court found the allegations serious, noting five complaints registered against the same account in different states, with victim witnesses supporting the prosecution case, making pre-arrest bail unsuitable despite the petitioner's claimed absence in Russia. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  5. 04-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1319/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Faijan Ansari, who was accused of operating an overseas employment fraud scheme that defrauded victims of Rs. 21,75,000 through forged documents and false promises. The Court found the allegations serious, noting five complaints registered against the same account in different states, with victim witnesses supporting the prosecution case, making pre-arrest bail unsuitable despite the petitioner's claimed absence in Russia. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case