MADHURENDRA KUMAR AND ORS vs State of Bihar — 1307/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BREC010044012026

Filing Number

4088/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

1307/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

1-Principal District and sessions Judge

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

26

Police Station

KURWA CHAINPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MADHURENDRA KUMAR AND ORS

    Adv. AMIT KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Order By Court

    The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by five petitioners (Madhurendra Kumar, Satyendra Kumar, Anil Kumar, Hari Bhagwan Ray, and Raju Ranjan Kumar) accused of assaulting the informant and family members with weapons during a land dispute. The court found the allegations serious based on injury reports documenting multiple grievous wounds, witness corroboration, and most petitioners' criminal antecedents, determining they were not entitled to pre-arrest bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  5. 04-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  6. 26-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1307/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by five petitioners (Madhurendra Kumar, Satyendra Kumar, Anil Kumar, Hari Bhagwan Ray, and Raju Ranjan Kumar) accused of assaulting the informant and family members with weapons during a land dispute. The court found the allegations serious based on injury reports documenting multiple grievous wounds, witness corroboration, and most petitioners' criminal antecedents, determining they were not entitled to pre-arrest bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case