MOIN AKHTAR vs State of Bihar — 1305/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 438. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BREC010043972026

Filing Number

4084/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

1305/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

108

Police Station

GHORASAHAN

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOIN AKHTAR

    Adv. MD KASHIM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Order By Court

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Order By Court

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Order By Court

    Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge rejected Bablu Chaudhary's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving serious assault with weapons on April 8, 2026. The court found sufficient evidence that the petitioner participated in a violent mob attack causing grievous head injuries, fractures, and unconsciousness to the victim, corroborated by medical reports and witness statements, making the allegations serious in nature and unsuitable for anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st

  6. 26-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st

  7. 23-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st

  8. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st

  9. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1305/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge rejected Bablu Chaudhary's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving serious assault with weapons on April 8, 2026. The court found sufficient evidence that the petitioner participated in a violent mob attack causing grievous head injuries, fractures, and unconsciousness to the victim, corroborated by medical reports and witness statements, making the allegations serious in nature and unsuitable for anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case