JITENDRA KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 1298/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BREC010043892026

Filing Number

4076/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

1298/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

1-Principal District and sessions Judge

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

28

Police Station

PAHARPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JITENDRA KUMAR

    Adv. BALDEO SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Order By CourtView PDF

    Summary The Sessions Judge rejected Jitendra Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving alleged assault with a deadly weapon (Pharsa), attack on family members, and theft of gold jewelry. The court found the FIR allegations credible, noting serious charges including attempted murder, assault on multiple persons including children, and looting, which warranted denying pre-arrest bail protection despite the petitioner's claims of innocence and counter-allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  5. 04-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1298/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Judge rejected Jitendra Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving alleged assault with a deadly weapon (Pharsa), attack on family members, and theft of gold jewelry. The court found the FIR allegations credible, noting serious charges including attempted murder, assault on multiple persons including children, and looting, which warranted denying pre-arrest bail protection despite the petitioner's claims of innocence and counter-allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case