BASANT KUMAR AND ORS vs State of Bihar — 1293/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 438. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BREC010043842026

Filing Number

4071/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

1293/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

1-Principal District and sessions Judge

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

177

Police Station

CHHAURADANO

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BASANT KUMAR AND ORS

    Adv. RAMAKANT SHUKLA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Order By CourtView PDF

    The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Basant Kumar, Niraj Kumar, and Rahul Kumar, who were accused of assaulting and attempting to kidnap the informant's son under IPC sections 447, 341, 342, 323, 365, and 511/34. The court found credible corroborating evidence in the case diary from the informant and witnesses, four seized motorcycles, and noted that this was a second petition filed after the petitioners failed to comply with the earlier court order directing them to surrender and seek regular bail, indicating they were evading the legal process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  5. 19-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1293/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Basant Kumar, Niraj Kumar, and Rahul Kumar, who were accused of assaulting and attempting to kidnap the informant's son under IPC sections 447, 341, 342, 323, 365, and 511/34. The court found credible corroborating evidence in the case diary from the informant and witnesses, four seized motorcycles, and noted that this was a second petition filed after the petitioners failed to comply with the earlier court order directing them to surrender and seek regular bail, indicating they were evading the legal process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case