RAJESHWAR RAY AND ORS vs State of Bihar — 642/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 02nd April 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BREC010043762026
Filing Number
4063/2026
Filing Date
07-Mar-2026
Registration No
642/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Motihari
Judge
26-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 19th
Decision Date
02-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 07-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
177
Police Station
GHORASAHAN
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJESHWAR RAY AND ORS
Adv. AMIT KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Apr-2026
Order By CourtView PDF
The bail petition of Rajeshwar Ray and Rameshwar Ray was rejected by the District & Additional Sessions Judge, East Champaran. The court found that the petitioners inflicted multiple blows to the informant's brother's head (including one with a farsa/axe), corroborated by injury reports, and considered their criminal antecedents and the ongoing investigation as grounds for denying bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 19th
-
01-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 19th
-
30-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 19th
-
28-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 19th
-
26-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 19th
-
23-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 19th
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 19th
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 19th
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 642/2026
The bail petition of Rajeshwar Ray and Rameshwar Ray was rejected by the District & Additional Sessions Judge, East Champaran. The court found that the petitioners inflicted multiple blows to the informant's brother's head (including one with a farsa/axe), corroborated by injury reports, and considered their criminal antecedents and the ongoing investigation as grounds for denying bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts