UMAR ALAM vs State of Bihar — 632/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BREC010043662026

Filing Number

4053/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

632/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

1-Principal District and sessions Judge

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

30

Police Station

BHOPATPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UMAR ALAM

    Adv. DR.ADHIR KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Order By CourtView PDF

    Case Summary The Sessions Judge rejected Umar Alam's bail petition in connection with charges of handling a stolen motorcycle (Patahi P.S. Case No. 246/2018). The court found that the petitioner was arrested at the spot with the stolen motorcycle, police discovered mismatched chassis and engine numbers, and prosecution witnesses corroborated the F.I.R. Despite the petitioner's clean criminal record and claim of good faith purchase, the court declined bail at this stage due to the nature of allegations and ongoing investigation, but permitted renewal of the bail application after charge framing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 632/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Sessions Judge rejected Umar Alam's bail petition in connection with charges of handling a stolen motorcycle (Patahi P.S. Case No. 246/2018). The court found that the petitioner was arrested at the spot with the stolen motorcycle, police discovered mismatched chassis and engine numbers, and prosecution witnesses corroborated the F.I.R. Despite the petitioner's clean criminal record and claim of good faith purchase, the court declined bail at this stage due to the nature of allegations and ongoing investigation, but permitted renewal of the bail application after charge framing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case