RAMU SINGH vs State of Bihar — 1269/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BREC010042942026

Filing Number

3991/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

1269/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

18-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

310

Police Station

KURWA CHAINPUR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMU SINGH

    Adv. SHAILENDRA KUMAR JHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order By CourtView PDF

    The District & Additional Sessions Court, East Champaran rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Ramu Singh @ Ramu Kumar in a case involving armed robbery at a grocery shop (³₹3.15 lakhs in Nepali rupees and ₹90 stolen). The court found sufficient evidence against the petitioner, including witness statements supporting the informant's allegations, recovery of looted articles from a co-accused's possession, and the co-accused's confessional statement naming the petitioner, while investigation was still ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1269/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District & Additional Sessions Court, East Champaran rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Ramu Singh @ Ramu Kumar in a case involving armed robbery at a grocery shop (³₹3.15 lakhs in Nepali rupees and ₹90 stolen). The court found sufficient evidence against the petitioner, including witness statements supporting the informant's allegations, recovery of looted articles from a co-accused's possession, and the co-accused's confessional statement naming the petitioner, while investigation was still ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case