MD SHAHJAD ALIAS SHAHJAD ANSARI vs State of Bihar — 1215/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BREC010040732026

Filing Number

3782/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

1215/2026

Registration Date

28-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 5th

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD SHAHJAD ALIAS SHAHJAD ANSARI

    Adv. MD MUMTAZ ALAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Order By Court

    Summary: The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Md. Shahjad Ansari, accused under Sections 196 and 299 of B.N.S. for allegedly pasting inflammatory posters depicting the 1992 Babri Masjid incident on Hindu homes to incite communal disturbances. The judge found the allegations serious, noted witness support for the prosecution case, and observed that investigation was ongoing, making pre-arrest bail inappropriate despite the petitioner's claims of false implication and physical disability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 5th

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 5th

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1215/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Md. Shahjad Ansari, accused under Sections 196 and 299 of B.N.S. for allegedly pasting inflammatory posters depicting the 1992 Babri Masjid incident on Hindu homes to incite communal disturbances. The judge found the allegations serious, noted witness support for the prosecution case, and observed that investigation was ongoing, making pre-arrest bail inappropriate despite the petitioner's claims of false implication and physical disability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case