SURENDRA MAHTO AND ORS vs State of Bihar — 1194/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BREC010040152026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

3727/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

1194/2026

Registration Date

27-02-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

1-Principal District and sessions Judge

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

72

Police Station

BANJARIA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

SURENDRA MAHTO AND ORS

Adv. KANAHAIYA PD. SINGH

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and sessions Judge

17-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

HEARING

28-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
Order By Court

SUMMARY: The Sessions Court granted bail to Surendra Mahato and Guddhu Kumar in an FIR involving charges under IPC sections 126(2), 303(2), 109, 74, 351(2), 352, and 115(2), relating to an alleged assault on a woman. The court found that while the applicants were named as accused, the victim's injuries were minor, there was no prior criminal history, both parties had settled the matter, and a reconciliation was evidenced by a photographic settlement deed. The court ordered their release on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of equal amount, subject to cooperation in the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The Sessions Court granted bail to Surendra Mahato and Guddhu Kumar in an FIR involving charges under IPC sections 126(2), 303(2), 109, 74, 351(2), 352, and 115(2), relating to an alleged assault on a woman. The court found that while the applicants were named as accused, the victim's injuries were minor, there was no prior criminal history, both parties had settled the matter, and a reconciliation was evidenced by a photographic settlement deed. The court ordered their release on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of equal amount, subject to cooperation in the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Motihari All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case