SURENDRA MAHTO AND ORS vs State of Bihar — 1194/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BREC010040152026

Filing Number

3727/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

1194/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

1-Principal District and sessions Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

72

Police Station

BANJARIA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURENDRA MAHTO AND ORS

    Adv. KANAHAIYA PD. SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Order By Court

    SUMMARY: The Sessions Court granted bail to Surendra Mahato and Guddhu Kumar in an FIR involving charges under IPC sections 126(2), 303(2), 109, 74, 351(2), 352, and 115(2), relating to an alleged assault on a woman. The court found that while the applicants were named as accused, the victim's injuries were minor, there was no prior criminal history, both parties had settled the matter, and a reconciliation was evidenced by a photographic settlement deed. The court ordered their release on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of equal amount, subject to cooperation in the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1194/2026

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The Sessions Court granted bail to Surendra Mahato and Guddhu Kumar in an FIR involving charges under IPC sections 126(2), 303(2), 109, 74, 351(2), 352, and 115(2), relating to an alleged assault on a woman. The court found that while the applicants were named as accused, the victim's injuries were minor, there was no prior criminal history, both parties had settled the matter, and a reconciliation was evidenced by a photographic settlement deed. The court ordered their release on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of equal amount, subject to cooperation in the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case