SANJAY KUMAR ALIAS SANJAY KUMAR YADAV vs State of Bihar — 1125/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 04th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BREC010037452026

Filing Number

3480/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

1125/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

1-Principal District and sessions Judge

Decision Date

04-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

26

Police Station

CHIRAIYA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANJAY KUMAR ALIAS SANJAY KUMAR YADAV

    Adv. SUJIT KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    Order By CourtView PDF

    The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Sanjay Kumar Yadav, who was accused of abusing an informant, demanding extortion (rangdari), and firing at him on 22-12-2025 under charges of criminal intimidation, criminal force, and arms violations. The court found the allegations credible based on corroborating witness statements and the informant's re-statement, and considered the petitioner's two prior criminal cases as aggravating factors in denying pre-arrest bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1125/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Sanjay Kumar Yadav, who was accused of abusing an informant, demanding extortion (rangdari), and firing at him on 22-12-2025 under charges of criminal intimidation, criminal force, and arms violations. The court found the allegations credible based on corroborating witness statements and the informant's re-statement, and considered the petitioner's two prior criminal cases as aggravating factors in denying pre-arrest bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case