FULA DEVI AND ORS vs State of Bihar — 1123/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 04th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BREC010037432026

Filing Number

3478/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

1123/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

1-Principal District and sessions Judge

Decision Date

04-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

44

Police Station

RAM GARHWA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.FULA DEVI AND ORS

    Adv. RUPNARAYAN YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    Order By Court

    SUMMARY: The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by eight accused persons (Fula Devi and seven others) in a murder case involving the death of Jitendra Kumar, a bank manager. The court found that witness statements and the informant's re-statement corroborated the FIR allegations of murder, and considering the nature of the allegations and available evidence in the case diary, the court deemed pre-arrest bail inappropriate despite the petitioners' clean criminal record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1123/2026

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by eight accused persons (Fula Devi and seven others) in a murder case involving the death of Jitendra Kumar, a bank manager. The court found that witness statements and the informant's re-statement corroborated the FIR allegations of murder, and considering the nature of the allegations and available evidence in the case diary, the court deemed pre-arrest bail inappropriate despite the petitioners' clean criminal record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case