AWADH KISHORE YADAV ALIAS AWADH KISHORE PRASAD YADAV AND ORS vs State of Bihar — 1115/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th April 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BREC010037172026

Case disposed

Filing Number

3452/2026

Filing Date

23-02-2026

Registration No

1115/2026

Registration Date

24-02-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

1-Principal District and sessions Judge

Decision Date

07th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

206

Police Station

ADAPUR

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

AWADH KISHORE YADAV ALIAS AWADH KISHORE PRASAD YADAV AND ORS

Adv. VINOD KUMAR PRASAD

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and sessions Judge

07-04-2026

Disposed

02-04-2026

HEARING

23-03-2026

HEARING

12-03-2026

HEARING

25-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

07-04-2026
Order By Court

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Judge of East Champaran granted anticipatory bail to seven accused (Awadh Kishor Yadav and six others) in a case involving charges of rioting, criminal intimidation, voluntarily causing hurt, and theft (IPC §341, 323, 324, 307, 354, 379, 504/34). The court found the allegations lack corroborating medical evidence—only one injury was medically documented, and witnesses failed to substantiate key claims of house burglary and assault on the complainant's wife, noting the accused and complainant were neighbors involved in an ongoing land dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Judge of East Champaran granted anticipatory bail to seven accused (Awadh Kishor Yadav and six others) in a case involving charges of rioting, criminal intimidation, voluntarily causing hurt, and theft (IPC §341, 323, 324, 307, 354, 379, 504/34). The court found the allegations lack corroborating medical evidence—only one injury was medically documented, and witnesses failed to substantiate key claims of house burglary and assault on the complainant's wife, noting the accused and complainant were neighbors involved in an ongoing land dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Motihari All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case