AWADH KISHORE YADAV ALIAS AWADH KISHORE PRASAD YADAV AND ORS vs State of Bihar — 1115/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BREC010037172026
Filing Number
3452/2026
Filing Date
23-Feb-2026
Registration No
1115/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Motihari
Judge
1-Principal District and sessions Judge
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
206
Police Station
ADAPUR
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AWADH KISHORE YADAV ALIAS AWADH KISHORE PRASAD YADAV AND ORS
Adv. VINOD KUMAR PRASAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
Order By Court
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Judge of East Champaran granted anticipatory bail to seven accused (Awadh Kishor Yadav and six others) in a case involving charges of rioting, criminal intimidation, voluntarily causing hurt, and theft (IPC §341, 323, 324, 307, 354, 379, 504/34). The court found the allegations lack corroborating medical evidence—only one injury was medically documented, and witnesses failed to substantiate key claims of house burglary and assault on the complainant's wife, noting the accused and complainant were neighbors involved in an ongoing land dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
02-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 1115/2026
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Judge of East Champaran granted anticipatory bail to seven accused (Awadh Kishor Yadav and six others) in a case involving charges of rioting, criminal intimidation, voluntarily causing hurt, and theft (IPC §341, 323, 324, 307, 354, 379, 504/34). The court found the allegations lack corroborating medical evidence—only one injury was medically documented, and witnesses failed to substantiate key claims of house burglary and assault on the complainant's wife, noting the accused and complainant were neighbors involved in an ongoing land dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts