RAJESH SINGH vs State of Bihar — 538/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BREC010037032026
Filing Number
3438/2026
Filing Date
23-Feb-2026
Registration No
538/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Motihari
Judge
1-Principal District and sessions Judge
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 07-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
30
Police Station
PATAHI
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJESH SINGH
Adv. RAM DHANI SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
Order By Court
Case Summary The Sessions Court of East Champaran granted bail to Rajesh Singh in a theft case (IPC Section 379) under Case No. 30/2018. The court found that Singh was not named in the FIR, was not arrested at the crime scene, no incriminating material was recovered from him, and the investigation was conducted without proper inquiry. The court approved the bail application on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, imposing conditions that the accused cooperate in proceedings and appear before the investigating officer as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 538/2026
Case Summary The Sessions Court of East Champaran granted bail to Rajesh Singh in a theft case (IPC Section 379) under Case No. 30/2018. The court found that Singh was not named in the FIR, was not arrested at the crime scene, no incriminating material was recovered from him, and the investigation was conducted without proper inquiry. The court approved the bail application on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, imposing conditions that the accused cooperate in proceedings and appear before the investigating officer as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts