DILIP KUMAR SINGH vs State of Bihar — 534/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BREC010036992026

Filing Number

3434/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

534/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

1-Principal District and sessions Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

23

Police Station

HARAIYA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DILIP KUMAR SINGH

    Adv. SUJIT KUMAR TIWARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order By Court

    Summary: The Sessions Court rejected the bail petition of Dilip Kumar Singh, accused of involvement in large-scale counterfeit currency printing and supply under various BNS sections. The court found substantial evidence in the FIR and case diary, including recovery of counterfeit notes worth Rs.25,00,000 and corroborating witness statements, and determined that ongoing investigation and the serious nature of the allegations warranted continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 534/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Sessions Court rejected the bail petition of Dilip Kumar Singh, accused of involvement in large-scale counterfeit currency printing and supply under various BNS sections. The court found substantial evidence in the FIR and case diary, including recovery of counterfeit notes worth Rs.25,00,000 and corroborating witness statements, and determined that ongoing investigation and the serious nature of the allegations warranted continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case