MANJU DEVI AND ORS vs State of Bihar — 1103/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 438. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BREC010036592026

Filing Number

3394/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

1103/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

4-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 6th

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

345

Police Station

TURKOLIA

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANJU DEVI AND ORS

    Adv. SUBODH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Order By CourtView PDF

    The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Manju Devi and Virendra Manjhi, who were accused of kidnapping a minor girl under IPC sections 363, 366A, 372/34 and POCSO Act section 8. The court found the allegations direct and specific, noting the victim's statement confirmed the petitioners helped co-accused Mukesh Kumar kidnap her and transport her to Punjab where she was assaulted, and that the investigation remained ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 6th

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 6th

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 6th

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 6th

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1103/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Manju Devi and Virendra Manjhi, who were accused of kidnapping a minor girl under IPC sections 363, 366A, 372/34 and POCSO Act section 8. The court found the allegations direct and specific, noting the victim's statement confirmed the petitioners helped co-accused Mukesh Kumar kidnap her and transport her to Punjab where she was assaulted, and that the investigation remained ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case