HARI RAI AND ORS vs State of Bihar — 1147/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 438. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 04th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BREC010036472026
Filing Number
3387/2026
Filing Date
21-Feb-2026
Registration No
1147/2026
Registration Date
25-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Motihari
Judge
1-Principal District and sessions Judge
Decision Date
04-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 15-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
84
Police Station
PAKRI DAYAL
Year
2011
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HARI RAI AND ORS
Adv. NIRAJ KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Apr-2026
Order By CourtView PDF
Case Summary: Hari Rai and Ors v. State of Bihar (1147/2026) The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition of five accused charged under IPC sections 302 and 201/34 for allegedly snatching and disposing of a child's dead body. Although witnesses made no specific allegations against the petitioners and police found them innocent, the court denied bail citing their deliberate delay in the legal process since cognizance in 2013 and criminal antecedents of two petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
30-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
19-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 1147/2026
Case Summary: Hari Rai and Ors v. State of Bihar (1147/2026) The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition of five accused charged under IPC sections 302 and 201/34 for allegedly snatching and disposing of a child's dead body. Although witnesses made no specific allegations against the petitioners and police found them innocent, the court denied bail citing their deliberate delay in the legal process since cognizance in 2013 and criminal antecedents of two petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts