SACHIN KUMAR ALIAS CHHOTELAL KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 1084/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BREC010036282026

Filing Number

3368/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

1084/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

1-Principal District and sessions Judge

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

345

Police Station

LAKHAURA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SACHIN KUMAR ALIAS CHHOTELAL KUMAR

    Adv. HEMANT KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Order By CourtView PDF

    Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Sachin Kumar and Akash Kumar. The judge found that the allegations against them—including abusing and assaulting the informant and his family members with weapons, causing grievous injuries—were credible, supported by medical evidence and witness corroboration in the FIR and case diary, making this an unfit case for anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1084/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Sachin Kumar and Akash Kumar. The judge found that the allegations against them—including abusing and assaulting the informant and his family members with weapons, causing grievous injuries—were credible, supported by medical evidence and witness corroboration in the FIR and case diary, making this an unfit case for anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case