JUMMAN MIYA vs State of Bihar — 502/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BREC010034932026

Filing Number

3239/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

502/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

1-Principal District and sessions Judge

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

144

Police Station

MAHUAWA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JUMMAN MIYA

    Adv. SHAILENDRA KUMAR JHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Order By CourtView PDF

    The Sessions Judge rejected the bail petition of 80-year-old Jumman Miya, accused of murdering his daughter-in-law in a dowry-related case. The court found that the FIR allegations are serious, medical evidence (strangulation asphyxia with ligature marks) corroborates the crime, and witnesses including independent witnesses have supported the prosecution case, warranting continued judicial custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  8. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 502/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge rejected the bail petition of 80-year-old Jumman Miya, accused of murdering his daughter-in-law in a dowry-related case. The court found that the FIR allegations are serious, medical evidence (strangulation asphyxia with ligature marks) corroborates the crime, and witnesses including independent witnesses have supported the prosecution case, warranting continued judicial custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case