NARESH RAI vs State of Bihar — 481/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BREC010034082026

Filing Number

3159/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

481/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

1-Principal District and sessions Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 22-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

129

Police Station

RAJEPUR

Year

2014

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NARESH RAI

    Adv. NITESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Order By CourtView PDF

    Summary of Bail Petition No. 481 of 2026 The Sessions Judge rejected Naresh Rai's bail petition in a murder case (IPC §364, 120(B), 302/34) involving the alleged kidnapping and murder of Kavindra Rai. Although Rai was unnamed in the original FIR, co-accused confessional statements identified him as involved in the crime, and the court found sufficient grounds to deny bail given the ongoing investigation and serious charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  7. 21-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 481/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Bail Petition No. 481 of 2026 The Sessions Judge rejected Naresh Rai's bail petition in a murder case (IPC §364, 120(B), 302/34) involving the alleged kidnapping and murder of Kavindra Rai. Although Rai was unnamed in the original FIR, co-accused confessional statements identified him as involved in the crime, and the court found sufficient grounds to deny bail given the ongoing investigation and serious charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case