KRISHNA THAKUR vs State of Bihar — 427/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BREC010029862026

Filing Number

2755/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

427/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

1-Principal District and sessions Judge

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

628

Police Station

SUGAULI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KRISHNA THAKUR

    Adv. HARESHWAR PRASAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Order By CourtView PDF

    The Sessions Court of East Champaran granted bail to Krishna Thakur in a battery theft case (FIR 628/2025 under IPC Section 303(2)) on the grounds that he was not named in the FIR, was not arrested at the crime scene, and has a clean criminal history with less than seven years sentence provision. The court imposed a bail bond of ₹10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, conditioning the bail on the accused's cooperation during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  5. 19-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  9. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 427/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Court of East Champaran granted bail to Krishna Thakur in a battery theft case (FIR 628/2025 under IPC Section 303(2)) on the grounds that he was not named in the FIR, was not arrested at the crime scene, and has a clean criminal history with less than seven years sentence provision. The court imposed a bail bond of ₹10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, conditioning the bail on the accused's cooperation during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case