DEEWAKAR KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 938/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 02nd April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BREC010029752026
Filing Number
2744/2026
Filing Date
13-Feb-2026
Registration No
938/2026
Registration Date
16-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Motihari
Judge
1-Principal District and sessions Judge
Decision Date
02-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 07-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
62
Police Station
LAKHAURA
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DEEWAKAR KUMAR
Adv. MUKESH PRASAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Apr-2026
Order By Court
Case Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Deewakar Kumar, who is accused of murder (IPC §302) and criminal conspiracy (§120B/34) in connection with the death of Dipesh Kumar. The judge found sufficient corroborating evidence including witness statements, postmortem reports confirming death by knife wounds, and the petitioner's prior criminal record, making the charges grave and the allegations credible despite the petitioner's claims of innocence and village politics. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
30-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
19-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 938/2026
Case Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Deewakar Kumar, who is accused of murder (IPC §302) and criminal conspiracy (§120B/34) in connection with the death of Dipesh Kumar. The judge found sufficient corroborating evidence including witness statements, postmortem reports confirming death by knife wounds, and the petitioner's prior criminal record, making the charges grave and the allegations credible despite the petitioner's claims of innocence and village politics. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts