SONI KUMARI vs State of Bihar — 902/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 438. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BREC010029002026

Filing Number

2677/2026

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

902/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

1-Principal District and sessions Judge

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

118

Police Station

KOTWA

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SONI KUMARI

    Adv. JITENDRA KUMAR MISHRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    Order By Court

    The court dismissed the anticipatory bail petition as unmaintainable. The petitioner had previously obtained anticipatory bail from the Patna High Court but failed to surrender within the stipulated four weeks and her extension request was rejected. The court found she evaded the legal process, disobeyed court orders, and filed a second petition without any change in circumstances to benefit from her own wrongdoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 902/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the anticipatory bail petition as unmaintainable. The petitioner had previously obtained anticipatory bail from the Patna High Court but failed to surrender within the stipulated four weeks and her extension request was rejected. The court found she evaded the legal process, disobeyed court orders, and filed a second petition without any change in circumstances to benefit from her own wrongdoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case