DEEPAK MAHTO vs State of Bihar — 389/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BREC010026352026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2430/2026
Filing Date
10-02-2026
Registration No
389/2026
Registration Date
11-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Motihari
Judge
1-Principal District and sessions Judge
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
72
Police Station
BANJARIA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DEEPAK MAHTO
Adv. KANAHAIYA PD. SINGH
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and sessions Judge
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 27-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 21-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 12-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Summary The Sessions Court of East Champaran granted bail to accused Deepak Mahato on March 17, 2026, in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 126(2), 303(2), 109, 74, 352, 351(2), 3/5, and 115. The court found that while serious allegations of group assault causing injury existed, the matter had been settled between both parties, no prior criminal history was recorded, and the accused had been in custody since January 26, 2026. Bail was approved upon furnishing a bond of ₹10,000 with two sureties on the condition of cooperation during investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Summary The Sessions Court of East Champaran granted bail to accused Deepak Mahato on March 17, 2026, in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 126(2), 303(2), 109, 74, 352, 351(2), 3/5, and 115. The court found that while serious allegations of group assault causing injury existed, the matter had been settled between both parties, no prior criminal history was recorded, and the accused had been in custody since January 26, 2026. Bail was approved upon furnishing a bond of ₹10,000 with two sureties on the condition of cooperation during investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts